Emotional Intelligence Effects on Academic Performance. An Empirical Study of University Students

 

 ALEXANDROS G SAHINIDIS

Department of Business Administration, TEI of Athens, Greece

DIMITRIOS KALLIVOKAS

Department of Business Administration, TEI of Athens, Greece

ANTHOULA MARKANTONATOU

Department of Business Administration, TEI of Athens, Greece

LABROS SDROLIAS

Department of Business Administration, TEI of Thessaly, Greece

 

 

ABSTRACT

The relationship between Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Academic Performance, although investigated in previous studies, has failed to yield consistent findings raising the need for further study. The purpose of this study is to further illuminate the link between EI and student scholastic achievements, closing the gap in the extant literature. Furthermore, the gender differences were investigated in regard to possible differences of EI and its facets and their respective relationship to performance. The 30-item Likert scale questionnaire used, was completed close to 600 university students who were asked to respond to the 30 EI- related questions and report their GPA, both the actual and the one they perceived they deserved. A regression analysis was used to determine the explaining power of EI over the student performance. The results indicate that there is a statistically significant relationship between EI, overall as well as two of its facets with academic performance. Furthermore, gender differences were also found in self-control and emotionality. The implications of this study for educators and academic policy makers are considerable, since the systematic fostering of EI in students could lead to greater educational outcomes and more effective institutions

Key Words: Emotional Intelligence, Academic Performance, University Students

 

 

1    Introduction

Emotional Intelligence (EI) studies abound, since the popularizing of the concept by Goleman (1995) in the mid- 90’s, examining the relationship of the concept with various personal as well as organizational outcomes (Karim, J. Bibi, Z. Rehman, S. and Khan, M, 2015); Jordan & Troth, 2011). The research on EI followed two diverging streams the Trait EI and the Ability EI. Among the leading scholars in the Trait EI approach Petrides and his associates define EI as “a constellation of behavioral dispositions and self-perceptions concerning one’s ability to recognize, process, and utilize emotion-laden information.” (Petrides & Furnham, 2003, p. 278). Trait EI is typically studied through self-reports along with other personality traits. Ability EI refers to “the ability to monitor one’s own and others’ feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this information to guide one’s thinking and actions” (Salovey & Mayer, 1990, p. 189). Ability EI is measured through performance based questionnaires, in a similar way to the cognitive ability measurement (Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2000). The ability EI approach is particularly challenging since it requires the construction of relevant items that can be objectively scored as correct or incorrect, posing thus measurement problems. Trait EI, on the other hand is relatively easy to use and it has been used by several researchers in the literature (Bar-On, 1997; Schutte et al., 1998; Petrides & Furnham, 2001; Petrides et al., 2016). Various researches have well-documented the empirical differences between the two approaches (Warwick & Nettelbeck, 2004).  Although the two streams use different operationalization of their constructs both have shown strong predictive ability in regards to numerous academic, career, and life outcomes (Petrides et al., 2016; Amdurer, Boyatzis, Saatcioglu, Smith, & Taylor, 2014). The present study mainly concerns the first stream, that is, trait EI.

 

  2    Emotional intelligence and academic performance  

Several researchers endeavored to examine the relationship between trait EI and ability EI with academic achievement, investigating in parallel EI relationship with factors impeding or fostering student performance such problem-solving skills (Salovey, Mayer, Caruso, & Yoo, 2008), year retention at the university level (Qualter, Whiteley, Morley, & Dudiak, 2009), psychological wellbeing (Salami, 2011), quality of interpersonal relationships (Afolabi, Okediji and Ogunmwonyi, 2009) and Academic Achievement measured by standardized test scores, grade point average on graduation ( Fernández, Salamonson, & Griffiths, 2012; Hogan et al., 2010; Keefer, Parker, & Wood, 2012; MacCann et al., 2011; Perera & Digiacomo, 2013).  The influence of EI, as a facilitator, within academic domains has mostly been attributed to student abilities to manage  the complexities of the social-emotional environment of academic environments (Matthews, Zeidner, & Roberts, 2002). More specifically, EI has been linked to psychological constructs that are believed to directly or indirectly contribute to academic success — such as need for achievement (Afolabi et al., 2009), adaptive coping strategies (MacCann et al., 2011; Tugade & Frederickson, 2008), and positive peer interactions (Mavroveli, Petrides, Rieffe, & Bakker, 2010; Petrides et al., 2008; Perera & Digiacomo, 2013).

 

2.1  Trait El and academic performance

Trait EI in general refers to various affective personality traits, related to typical behavioural patterns, fellings and thoughts, associated with self-control and self-motivation dispositions. (Perera & Digiakomo, 2013; Petrides, 2011; Petrides, Furnham, & Mavroveli, 2007). Studies have shown that the EI trait is genetics-related, with the latter explaining variation at levels of between 20% and 80%, co-varying with other super-factors, such as the Big Five (Perera & DiGiacomo, 2013). Performance in occupational and educational settings is typically influenced by the ability to perform or achieve (Blumberg & Pringle, 1982; McKenzie, Gow, & Schweitzer, 2004; Mouw & Khanna, 1993). Ability to perform is indicative of intelligence, skills and competences, while willingness to achieve centers on motivation, initiative and determination. Students with high EI trait are achievement oriented, and that  leads them to set academic goals in order to attain superior academic outcomes (Mount, Barrick, & Strauss, 1999). The determination of these students generates greater commitment to achieving their academic goals. One would expect then that high trait EI students would perform academically better than their low trait EI counterparts. In addition, relating to a student’s proclivity to low impulsiveness (Petrides, 2009, 2011), students with a high EI trait will tend to delay momentary gratification in the service of environmental demands and pursuit of established goals (Petrides, 2009). Low trait EI individuals, contrariwise, strongly tend toward impulsivity, yielding to the temptation of immediate gratification (Petrides, 2009; Petrides et al., 2004). In the words of Perera & DiGiacomo, (2013, p. 9) “To the extent that individuals set academic goals, which is typical of those with high trait EI, dispositional self-control tendencies may promote goal-approach and temptation avoidance in the service of maximising academic outcomes.”

It follows from the above that there are compelling reasons to further pursue an inquiry, into the relationship of EI with Academic Performance, in spite of the  “inconsistent findings” reported in various studies (Mavroveli et al., 2007; Newsome, Day και Catano (2000); Mavroveli & Sánchez-Ruiz, 2011). The purpose of this study then, is to investigate the relationship of trait EI with academic performance in the setting of a Greek university. No other studies with a similar sample have been conducted in Greece, to our knowledge and that is the contribution of our effort.

 

METHODOLOGY

The research was conducted in a large university in the area Athens, and it included students from a variety of schools and departments. In the period between October 2016 and February 2017, we invited the student population of the university to complete the online questionnaire we had set up and communicated it to them by electronic means. The respondents were 648, ranging in ages between 18 and 36. The questionnaire used in the present study TEIQue (Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire) has been developed and tested widely by Petrides & Furnham, (2001) and Petrides , Pita and Kokkinaki (2007), among other researchers and it is considered to be among the most valid in the trait EI approach in the extant literature. Petrides & Furnham, (2001), proposed the measurement of EI with the use of 15 characteristics, which could then load on four factors:  

           Wellbeing

           Self-control

           Emotionality

           Sociability

To avoid potential translation problems we used the Greek version of the EI instrument available by Petrides, Pita & Kokkinaki, (2007). The questionnaire used in this study is the 30-item short form which is o concise form of the original 153-item one used originally by the authors above. After a number of tests Petrides et al., (2007), concluded that the short version is almost as effective as the long one, while at the same time it offers brevity and maintains the answering persons’ attention.

The respondents were asked to complete the 7-grade Likert scale indicating agreement with the statement, while there were a number of reverse scored questions (7,  9, 10, 12,  13,  15, 17,  18,  19, 21, 23, 27, 30, 31, 33).

SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 20.0 was used for the data analysis.

To measure Academic Performance, we used three different measures, the grade point average (GPA)which is used elsewhere in the literature, the GPA, “I deserve”, to discern potential differences with the actual one, and to foster the respondents to be honest in disclosing their grades and a third one depicting the most recent performance of the student the GPA of the latest semester (Fernández, Salamonson, & Griffiths, 2012; Hogan et al., 2010; Keefer, Parker, & Wood, 2012; MacCann et al., 2011).

 

RESULTS

The statistical analysis  produced the following EI scores for each of the factors of EI

 

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

 

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Minimum

Maximum

Self-control

648

25,22

4,063

11

39

Well-being

648

26,95

3,568

16

42

Sociability

648

26,18

3,687

15

36

Emotionality

648

29,72

5,162

16

51

Total EI

648

124,42

11,588

91

186

 

 

We subsequently conducted a t-test to detect possible differences between the sexes.

 

 

Table 2. T-Test Independent Samples (Male-Female)

 

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

 

F

Sig.

T

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

 
 

Self-Control

 

,707

,401

-1,844

407

,066

-,721

,391

 

 

 

 

-1,830

373,840

,068

-,721

,394

 

Well-being

 

,263

,608

-1,754

407

,080

-,641

,366

 

 

 

 

-1,755

386,993

,080

-,641

,365

 

Sociability

 

,494

,483

-1,729

407

,085

-,642

,371

 

 

 

 

-1,736

391,587

,083

-,642

,370

 

Emotionality

 

2,014

,157

,135

407

,893

,072

,533

 

 

 

 

,137

404,263

,891

,072

,524

 

General EI

 

,051

,822

-1,695

407

,091

-1,948

1,149

 

 

 

 

-1,702

392,566

,089

-1,948

1,144

 

 

No significant differences are reported between the sexes, in all of the EI factors and the Total EI as well. This is not surprising since in previous studies only one has reported a significant difference between genders (Mayer et al. (2000) and Schutte et al (1998).

In order to test the relationship of EI with the GPA (our main measure of Academic Performance) we used a three-way split of the GPA scores: Low GPA (5.0-6.49), Medium (6.5-7.9), and High (8-10)

 

Table 3. ANOVA

 

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Self-control

 

Between Groups

30,508

2

15,254

,924

,398

Within Groups

10649,492

645

16,511

 

 

Total

10680,000

647

 

 

 

 Well-being

 

Between Groups

11,754

2

5,877

,461

,631

Within Groups

8224,462

645

12,751

 

 

Total

8236,216

647

 

 

 

Sociability

 

Between Groups

17,389

2

8,695

,639

,528

Within Groups

8777,845

645

13,609

 

 

Total

8795,235

647

 

 

 

Emotionality

 

Between Groups

34,048

2

17,024

,638

,529

Within Groups

17207,272

645

26,678

 

 

Total

17241,319

647

 

 

 

General EI

 

Between Groups

343,531

2

171,766

1,280

,279

Within Groups

86532,296

645

134,159

 

 

Total

86875,827

647

 

 

 

 

Table 3 (One-way ANOVA .indicates no relationship between the EI factors and performance measured by the GPA. The findings of the present study are in agreement with earlier finding reported in related research and they should not come as a surprise (Newsome, Day & Catano, 2000; O’ Connor & Little, 2003, Jaeger, Bresciani & Ward, 2003; Lyons & Schneider, 2005; Bastian, Burns & Nettekbeck, 2005; and Vishwanathan, 2008).

 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

A large number of studies suggest that EI relates to work performance. Occupational success, in a similar way to academic achievement is linked to setting reasonably high goals and achieving them, so as to experience the sense of accomplishment and at the same time avoiding the unpleasant experience of not attaining one’s goals. We expected that in the face of diverging findings reported by researchers heretofore, we will lend further support to the notion that EI does have a positive effect on student performance and the student support mechanisms in universities can actually help students improve their academic standing by adapting to the particularities of the local environment, helping them handle relationship problems and overall manage potential affective deficiencies.

The results of our study nevertheless do not support our expectations. According to Perera & DiGiacomo, (2013) it is possible that the use of any of the other two widely used instruments, i.e., Bar-On Emotion Quotient Inventory [EQ-i] and Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale [SEIS], could lead to different outcomes as compared to TEIQue. Another possibility also is that the use of the long version of the instrument could result to other conclusions. The role of moderators which did have a role in the Petrides et al., (2004), study, has not been investigated in this study and it could potentially be an important limitation of it. Moderating variables such as age of the respondents, year of study, along with the instrument used could be important factors affecting the outcomes of the study and they may be taken into account in future studies.

 

 

REFERENCES

Afolabi, O., Okediji, A., & Ogunmwonyi, E. (2009). Influence of emotional intelligence and need for achievement on interpersonal relations and academic achievement of undergraduates.’ Educational Research Quarterly, 33(2), pp. 15–29.

Amdurer, E., Boyatzis, E. B., Saatcioglu, A., Smith, M. L., & Taylor, S. N. (2014). Long term impact of emotional, social, and cognitive intelligence competencies and GMAT on career and life satisfaction and career success. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–15.

Bar-On, R. (1997). BarOn EmotionalQuotient Inventory: technicalmanual . Toronto: Multi-Health Systems   Inc.

Bastian, Veneta A., Nicholas R. Burns, and Ted Nettelbeck. "Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but  not as well as personality and cognitive abilities." Personality and individual differences 39.6 (2005): 1135-1145.

Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560-569

Fernández, R., Salamonson, Y., & Griffiths, R. (2012). Emotional intelligence as a predictor of academic performance in first-year accelerated graduate entry nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 3485–3492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702. 2012.04199.x.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: why it can matter more than IQ. London: Bloomsbury.

Hogan, M. J., Parker, J. D. A.,Wiener, J.,Watters, C.,Wood, L.M., & Oke, A. (2010). Academic success in adolescence: Relationships among verbal IQ, social support and emotional intelligence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62, 30–41.

Jaeger, A. J., Bresciani, M. J., & Ward, C. S. (2003).Predicting persistence and academic performance of first year students.An assessment of emotional intelligence and non-cognitive variables.M.A. North Carolina State University. Retrieved December 9, 2017, from http://www.ncsu.edu/assessment/resources/news/nov03.pdf

Karim, J. Bibi, Z. Rehman, S. and Khan, M (2015) Perceived Work-related Outcomes: Mediating Role of Workplace Incivility Victimization, Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 21-37

Keefer, K. V., Parker, J. D. A., &Wood, L. M. (2012). Trait emotional intelligence and university graduation outcomes: Using latent profile analysis to identify students at risk for degree noncompletion. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 402–413.

Lyons, J.B., Schneider, T. R. (2005). The influence of emotional intelligence on performance. Personality and Individual Differences 39, 693–703.

MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Coping mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 60–70.

McKenzie, K., Gow., K., & Schweitzer, R. (2004). Exploring first-year academic achievement through structural equation modelling. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 95-112.

Mavroveli, S., Petrides, K. V., Rieffe, C., & Bakker, F. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence, psychological wellbeing and peerrated competence in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology.

Mavroveli, S., Petrides, K. V., Rieffe, C., & Bakker, F. (2010). Trait emotional intelligence, psychological well-being and peer-rated social competence in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(2), 263–275.

Mavroveli S1, Sánchez-Ruiz MJ. (2011) Trait emotional intelligence influences on academic achievement and school behavior, British J Educational Psychology Mar;81(Pt 1):112-34.

Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2000). Competing models of emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 396–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2000). Selecting a measure of emotional intelligence; the case for ability scales. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.). The handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 320-342). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1999). The joint relationship of conscientiousness and ability with performance: Test of the interaction hypothesis. Journal of Management, 25, 707-721.

Mouw, J. T., & Khanna, R. K. (1993). Prediction of academic success: A review of the literature and some recommendations. College Student Journal, 27, 328-336.

Newsome, S., Day, A. L., & Catano, V. M. (2000). Assessing the predictive validity of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1005-1016.

O’ Connor, R. M., & Little, I. S. (2003). Revisiting the predictive validity of emotional intelligence: Self-report versus ability-based measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1893-1902.

Perera, H., & Digiacomo, H. (2013). The relationship of trait emotional intelligence with academic performance: A metaanalytic review. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 20–33.

Petrides, K. V., Mikolajczak, M., Mavroveli, S., Sanchez-Ruiz, M. J., Furnham, A., & Pérez-González, J. C. (2016). Developments in trait emotional intelligence research. Emotion Review, 8(4), 335–341.

Petrides, K. V. (2009). Technical manual for the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaires (TEIQue) (1st edition, 4th printing). London: London Psychometric Laboratory

Petrides, K. V. (2011). Ability and trait emotional intelligence. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, A. Furnham, & S. von Stumm (Eds.), The Blackwell-Wiley Handbook of Individual Differences (pp. 656-678). New York, NY: Wiley.

Petrides, K. V., Sangareau, Y., Furnham, A., & Frederickson, N. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence and children's peer relations at school. In J. C. Cassady, & M. A. Eissa, (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: Perspectives on educational and positive psychology (pp. 63–76), Peter Lang Publishing New York, NY.

Petrides, K. V., Furnham, A., & Mavroveli, S. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence: Moving forward in the field of EI. In G. Matthews, M. Zeidner, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), The science of emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns – Series in Affective Sciences (pp. 288-304). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2001). Trait emotional intelligence: psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 425–448.

Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: behavioral validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39–75.

Petrides, Kostantinos V., Ria Pita, and Flora Kokkinaki. "The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space." British Journal of Psychology 98.2 (2007): 273-289.

Qualter, P., Whiteley, H., Morley, A., & Dudiak, H. (2009). The role of emotional intelligence in the decision to persist with academic studies in HE. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 14, 219–231.

Salami, S. O. (2011). Personality and psychological well-being of adolescents: The moderating role of emotional intelligence. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 39(6), 785–794.

Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211.

Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2008). The positive psychology of emotional intelligence. In J. C. Cassady, & M. A. Eissa (Eds.), Emotional intelligence perspectives on educational and positive psychology (pp. 185–208). New York: Peter Lang.

Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.

Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and individual differences, 25(2), 167-177.

Thomas,  Cassady and Heller (2017) The influence of emotional intelligence, cognitive test anxiety, and coping strategies on undergraduate academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences 55:40 – 48.

Tugade, M. M., & Frederickson, B. L. (2008). Positive emotions and emotional intelligence. In J. C. Cassady, & M. A. Eissa (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: Perspectives on educational and positive psychology (pp. 145–168). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing

Vishwanathan, R. (2008). Relating Academic Performance to Emotional Intelligence a Predictive Model. The Icfai Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 25-32.

Warwick J , Nettelbeck T . 2004 . Emotional Intelligence is … ? Personality and Individual Differences ,Vol. 37 , No.05 ,pp: 1091 -1100